Have you got a story to tell? Do you have pictures or video clips to share? Get in touch »
|
|
Love him or hate him, Roger Tichborne always has something to say about what's going on in the borough of Barnet. Rog lives and works in Mill Hill, where he runs a recording studio, plays in a band called The False Dots and 'likes a good argument'. |
8:59am Sunday 21st September 2008
Barnet is a suburb full of commuters. Many of them work in the financial services industry, which is currently seeing massive job cuts. Many families feel very worried about the future and how
they'll pay their bills. As such I was pleased to see a story entitled "Measures to help the hard up" appear on the Times website. When I read it my feelings turned to dismay. Here's why.
I don't know about you, but the main thing I want when I have a bill to pay is the money to pay it. If I have to pay the gas bill of £50, buy the family shopping for £50 and I only have £100 in my
bank account, I pay it. I don't have a curry or go to the pub that week. I tighten my belt. If I notice I can save £10 on my shopping by going to a different shop, thats what I do, then maybe I can
go to the pub. It's really not that hard.
When it comes to the Council, different rules apply. In 2002 Barnet elected a Tory council who proudly claimed that they'd cut taxes and waste when they were elected. Have we had a single tax cut ever - No. My Council Tax has risen every year. One year it rose 26%! That was supposed to be to plug a hole in the reserves. When the hole was plugged, were there cuts? No. Now I thought they were going to cut waste? Surely the cuts would plug the hole? Again it seems not.
Lets have a quick review of current hot news regarding waste. Ask yourself how many of these things are vital in difficult times. £91,000 on tellies for council officers desks and video conferencing equipment (to save £4,500 in annual hire costs). £1,000,000 on new laptop computers, many of which are unused, incurring extra storage expenses. Laptop computers which are old models and obsolete. £1,000,000 in various costs to reopen Partingdale Lane. £1,000,000 in costs to investigate the sale of Barnet Underhill stadium.
As I said earlier, if I want to save a bit of money, I shop around. Take the Telly & video conference equipment £91,000. Did Barnet put it out to tender (ie try and get the lowest price). No they didn't, as it is below the limit for doing this, according to a council spokesman. So there you have it, they only shop around when the rules say they have to.
How is the credit crunch affecting our beloved council officers and councillors. If you check the Barnet Council accounts, there is a section detailing the number of staff earning over £50,000. Every year this goes up. The number earning over £100,000 has risen to 17 this year. 5 of them got a Sony Plasma screen telly on their desk. The crunch really must be hurting them. As for councillors, allowances etc have risen to such a level that the 63 councillors now cost us around a million pounds. Just to be the chief whip of the Barnet Tories, you get an extra few thousand pounds of our money. Times are hard !!!
Now I thought the story would say how they would be cutting back, saving cash, letting us keep a bit of our own money, but no. They are setting up scheme's to help people claim more benefits and give people in exceptional hardship more cash. All very commendable, but doesn't it occur to them that the huge tax rises may have made them skint in the first place. Why not deal with the root cause?
The other part of the scheme struck me as truly bizarre. In a week when our larges mortgage lender nearly went bust and had to be taken over, as a result of lending to people without the cash to keep up mortgage payments, what have Barnet done?
They are setting up a scheme to give people £29,000 to help buy their council houses. I'd like £29,000 to help me pay my mortgage I can tell you. This scheme will reduce the stock of council houses, cost a fortune and a percentage of people will be enticed into taking on mortgages they can't afford and lose their homes. This was exactly what caused the credit crunch in the first place. Who is giving these tenants £29,000 to buy their council house (and hopefully sell at a huge profit in a few years). You got it we all are.
Here's what I'd do, to try and help the credit crunch. I'd cut out the outrageous waste. I'd cut back on highly paid staff. I'd shop around for everything. I'd not spend a penny of our money unless it delivered a benefit to the taxpayer as opposed to a council official. I'd take those plasma screen tellies on officers desks and put them on Ebay. Most of all I'd immediately stop the scheme to give people £29,000 to take on mortgages they won't be able to pay. Maybe then, in their seventh year they could deliver on the promise that enticed all of the poor fools in Barnet to vote for them, and actually cut your tax.
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Times Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
RobDCH, says...
2:43am Wed 24 Sep 08
It is 'up to a maximum' £29,000 (Depends on number of bedrooms)to give up your existing rented council house and towards a deposit on the Open market, thereby releasing a council property to let, until such time as the Right to Buy is exercised.
You are right about the rest, the Tories reasoning that one family's loss of a home as a result is bizarre, yet another entry on the Homeless Register yet also cheap pickings for a council tenant seeking an 'affordable'home to escape existing overcrowding, if they can support the mortgage repayments. They are so desperate to get rid of council housing that one can now buy the 'hallway or 2 steps of the stairs' of ones existing home.
So how much is in the kitty £1 million, 2 million to give up your council home or as the point you make, stop the scheme. We should build council houses so that the credit crunch homeless have a home with a secure tenancy managed by an accountable landlord, not some private company that has had over 4000 complaints for poor maintenance services by a 3rd party partner.
It should bring Barnet Homes and some of it's staff into council control once the Decent Homes Standard is fulfilled or, give us a ballot on whether Barnet's tenants & leaseholders wish to end up in Public Private Partnerships(PPPs)of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITS) and Local Housing Companies. All this is being currently reviewed by the council.
We have already seen the Stongrove Estate is subject to yet another Masterplan and an even greater deficit of homes for the can't affordables. Who knows when West Hendon will see the 'high rise' of the 60's, but not for them. We also forget the millions spent on 'Risk' cover for all of the 'R' projects.
It's amazing New Labour gives the New Tories the vehicle to do just what the old Tories so desired. It's well supported by some of the New Labour Councillors of Finchley wards.They know who they are.
The writing is on the wall, when some of the management board forgot who housed them and, whose kids will not have homes as easily as they did because of the deficit of new council homes, are all part of this participation process of no more council homes and secure tenancies. Credit Crunch, not in Barnet millions to give away, your money. Don't forget the Overspend to raise the Aerodrome Road Bridge.