Your news
Have you got a story to tell? Do you have pictures or video clips to share? Get in touch »
Quarter of pupils miss out
8:42am Thursday 6th March 2008
A quarter of children applying to Barnet schools will not be granted their first or second preference, according to Government figures released this week.
Of all the pupils seeking to study at a Barnet secondary school, 75.6 per cent were given one of their top two preferences. This is 3.4 per cent below the London average, and 20 per cent below Harrow, the borough with the best record.
Only 11 out of the 33 boroughs had a lower percentage, with Southwark faring the worst, at 69.6 per cent.
But the percentage of pupils gaining entry to their first choice Barnet school was an improvement on last year, up one per cent to 62 per cent, with 90 per cent of children being given one of their top six preferences - up five per cent from last year.
Barnet Council attributed the statistics to the popularity of its schools, which are highly oversubscribed. This year, 1,081 girls applied for 93 places at Henrietta Barnett School, in Central Square, Hampstead Garden Suburb, after its 2007 GCSE and A-level results placed it top in the country in many league tables.
Councillor Fiona Bulmer, cabinet member for children's services, said: "Many of our schools receive significantly more applicants than there are places. However, the number of parents offered their first preference school in Barnet has actually increased this year, and 90 per cent of parents have been offered a place at one of their preferred schools, all of which are high-performing good schools.
"The council's school admissions team is working closely with parents to support them during the process.
"It is also important to remember these figures will change as parents consider the offers they have received over the next two weeks and additional places then become available."
London Councils, a think tank that represents the interests of all 33 councils, confirmed that Barnet had an uphill struggle to cater for everyone wishing to take up school places in the borough.
A spokesman said: "Barnet has done well, considering its position. While some boroughs may not be meeting first preferences from their own pupils as highly as others, they may well be meeting a high proportion of first preferences from a neighbouring borough.
"For example, some school admissions policies use geographical distance from the school as one admission criterion. As a result, good schools situated on the border between two boroughs could end up taking more pupils from the neighbouring borough than its host borough."
Dr John Marincowitz, headteacher of Queen Elizabeth's School, in Queen's Road, Barnet, said Barnet was "superb" at dealing with admissions, but believed the whole system was in need of review.
He said: "This is nothing to do with Barnet, it is a much more widespread problem. There is far, far too much bureaucracy involved in the administration, with local authorities attempting to co-ordinate with one another.
"It seems that these days parents are much more anxious than ever."
Your sayYour Times
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Times Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Fortunate few: many children will miss out on schools like Henrietta Barnett
In this section
- Sentencing for Finchley cocaine dealer
- Edgware bus drivers in 24-hour strike
- Finchley man caught in Bangkok nightclub fire
- £12m for regeneration projects
- Royle honour for Liz Smith
- Hendon charity worker is 'wonderful choice' for MBE
- Mother's campaign honoured by Queen
- Review of the year
- New Year clamp down on rowdy revellers
- Busiest shopping day in five years
Sponsored Links
LOCAL LINKS
Local Information
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Huw Pryce, New Barnet says...
7:22pm Fri 7 Mar 08
With school performance judged in the way it is and set up as a competition (for crying out loud!), good schools will generally get better and bad schools worse. We are heading for an education system which ghettoises communities around schools; richer people around 'good' schools, poorer people around 'bad' schools and religious groups around faith schools.
Surely it would be better to insist that where possible children go to their nearest school. All schools should be challenged to perform equally well and should be encouraged to do so.
League tables, which are socially divisive, damaging to schools most in need of support and inherently misleading (my daughter's school falls below the best in the Borough, but since it has a high proportion of statemented pupils, mostly for language problems, the improvement in performance as children progress through the school outdoes that of local 'good' schools, yet ours is not people's first choice) should be abolished.
If we divide the 'pushy' parents more evenly around the school system instead of having them all compete to get their kids into the 'best' schools, they can devote their energies to pushing the school their child does attend to be the best it can be. More children will walk to school. Fewer cars will block the roads during the school run and all children will be treated the same, instead of a privileged few recieving high quality education at the cost of those less fortunate.